Bars state and local governments from condemning or damaging
private property to promote other private projects or uses.
Limits government’s authority to adopt certain land use,
housing, consumer, environmental and workplace laws and
regulations, except when necessary to preserve public health or
safety.
Voids unpublished eminent domain court decisions.
Defines “just compensation.”
Government must occupy condemned property or lease property
for public use.
Condemned private property must be offered for resale to
prior owner or owner’s heir at current fair market value if
government abandons condemnation’s objective.
Exempts certain governmental actions.
全部都是阻止政府的權力太大。阻止官商勾結,阻止政府大曬,就像憲法修定案的 Bill of Rights 一樣。
上星期,Secretary of State 記錄到 League of California Cities
捐反對90號提案250萬,仲有 California State Association of Counties 40萬,California
Redevelopment
Association30萬,加加埋埋超過320萬,再加埋大班捐客,如律師,大建築商,接政府工程的公司加起來超過500萬來反對保護業主權提案。
無它,想政府幫佢地收樓,唔想賠償足畀業主。90 YES,雖然我不是業主,但我支持自由。
10/24/06
副刊:戈爾精彩演說
"We are ready for any unforeseen event
that may or may not occur."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 9/22/97
"For NASA, space is still a high
priority."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 9/5/93
"Quite frankly, teachers are the only
profession that teach our children."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"The Holocaust was an obscene period
in our nation's history. I mean in this century's history. But
we all lived in this century. I didn't live in this century."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 9/15/95
"It isn't pollution that's harming the
environment. It's the impurities in our air and water that are
doing it."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"[It's] time for the human race to
enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"We're all capable of mistakes, but I
do not care to enlighten you on the mistakes we may or may not
have made."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"I believe we are on an irreversible
trend toward more freedom and democracy--but that could change."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 5/22/98
"One word sums up probably the
responsibility of any vice president, and that one word is 'to
be prepared.' "
-- Vice President Al Gore, 12/6/93
"Verbosity leads to unclear,
inarticulate things."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 11/30/96
"I have made good judgments in the
past. I have made good judgments in the future."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"The future will be better tomorrow."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"We're going to have the best-educated
American people in the world."
-- Vice President Al Gore, 9/21/97
"I stand by all the misstatements that
I've made."
-- Vice President Al Gore to Sam Donaldson, 8/17/93
"We have a firm commitment to NATO, we
are a 'part' of NATO. We have a firm commitment to Europe. We
are a 'part' of Europe."
-- Vice President Al Gore
10/23/06
副刊:今日左派學校的 field trip
做學生最喜歡就是可以去 field trip
,因為可以走出班房同埋又有教育意義。我的兩個女可以去動物園,去睇舞台劇,去睇馬戲,去參觀博物舘,去參觀法庭,又好玩又有野學。
通常學校話去 field
trip,都有一封信畀家長,話過我地知去邊度,點解要去睇嗰個話劇,有乜野學呀,去參觀法庭可以畀小朋友知道法治精神呀咁。但今時今日,學校左派老師又會點呢?
你看,一問到賓拉登,就發脾四,佢話佢想追殺賓拉登比布殊8個月來得多,又一個左派哲學,布殊只得8個月,但克林頓有8年呀!咁你都可以賴,不如跟賴絲姓賴啦。"They
ridicule me for trying," Clinton said. "They had eight months to try.
They did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed."
Now there’s an equation--approximately 240 days vs. approximately 11,000
days. Must be the new math for liberals!
一時又話主持人嬉皮笑面 smirk。一時又話佢 conservative hit job,neocons,right
wingers咁。原因?好簡單,佢講大話囉!克林頓一話大話就咁架啦。
自委國暴君 Hugo Chavez 在聯合國講左惡毒的反美國言論,你只聽見共和黨出來反擊?民主黨呢?有兩個走出來反擊喎,Pelosi
話佢是惡棍,濫用聯合國的發言權,自貶身份自貶委國!"Hugo Chavez abused the privilege that he had, speaking
at the United Nations. He demeaned himself and he demeaned Venezuela."
而紐約民主黨 Charles Rangel 就話布殊是美國大總統,邊個攻擊佢等於攻擊民主黨,共和黨,和全國人民。"George Bush is the
President of the United States and represents the entire country. Any demeaning
public attack against him is viewed by Republicans and Democrats, and all
Americans, as an attack on all of us."
不過又唔係個個咁正義,Tom Harkin 就話布殊咁嘅政策,有人有咁嘅反應都唔出奇吖。"Let me put it this way, I can
understand the frustration and the anger of certain people around the world
because of George Bush's policies."這是我們平日所聽民主黨的口氣。
多謝你,Pelosi, Rangel。 而 Harkin?唉!親共反骨仔。
9/20/06
副刊:麥基 McCain 的虐囚議案:即是不如唔好捉拿
點解我地要捉拿恐怖分子呢?因為我地要套口供,防止恐怖襲擊和捉拿更多的恐怖分子。就之前由
Abu Zubadayah 所套的口供中,得以捉拿 Ramzi bin al-Shib,再由佢口供捉拿 Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed,從而防止亞蓋達對美國的襲擊。但由於左派脆弱的意志,和希望得到歐洲的認同,我們再也不得不放棄這種咁有價值的套口供方式了。
在2002年所發現的一封信,賓拉登向塔利班領袖說:『a media campaign to create a wedge between the
American people and their
government. 利用傳媒運動製造美國人民利政府之間的矛盾。』賓拉登又話,這個訊息會說給美國人民知,『that their government will
bring them more losses in finances and
casualties 美國政府會給人民帶來更多的經濟負擔和傷亡數字。』他又說,只要亞蓋達傳達更多這樣的訊息,『aims at creating pressure
from the American people on the American government to stop their campaign
against Afghanistan.美國人民就會向政府施加壓力,美國就會停止向亞富汗的運動。』
2 Pigs in a Poke
As President Bush gets off the helicopter in front of
the White House, he is carrying a baby pig under each
arm. The squared away Marine guard snaps to attention,
salutes and says, “Nice pigs, sir.”
The President replies, “These are not pigs, these are
authentic Texas Razorback Hogs. I got one for
Representative Jack Murtha, and I got one for Senator
John Kerry.”
The squared away Marine again snaps to attention,
salutes and says, “Nice trade, sir.”
至於美國公民的慨念,你也要清楚,它的價值觀也在 oath of allegiance 中,公民宣誓中的“I hereby declare, on
oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance
and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of
whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will
support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of
America against all enemies, foreign and domestic...”當中的 law,當然也包括
immigration law。
So much for Republicans being the party of the wealthy. According to a new
study by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, that moniker more
appropriately belongs to the Democrats. "Republicans raised more than Democrats
from individuals who contributed small and medium amounts of money during the
2002 election cycle," the report notes, "but Democrats far outpaced Republicans
among deep-pocketed givers." Among donors who gave more than $200 but less than
$1,000, Republicans enjoyed a substantial $68 million to $44 million edge over
Democrats. The margin was closer among those individuals who gave $1,000 or
more: The GOP took in $317 million, compared to the Democrats' $307 million.
But among the fabulously wealthy, the Democrats cleaned house. Donors of $10,000
or more gave $140 million to Democrats, while only $111 million went to
Republicans. Among those individuals who gave $100,000 or more, the Democrats
raised $72 million compared to the Republicans' $34 million. And when it comes
to the millionaires' club - those kicking in $1 million or more - the Democratic
Party skunked the GOP, $36 million to $3 million. Needless to say, despite the
near-parity in overall amounts - $384 million to the Republicans vs. $350
million to the Democrats - the number of individual donors to the GOP exceeded
those to the Democratic Party by more than 40 percent.
In other words, in 2002 a select group of bigwigs dumped big money into
Democratic causes, while a broad base of folks donated respectable [but not
overwhelming] amounts to Republican candidates. That goes a long way toward
explaining the Democrats' shallow support in the midterm elections, and should
give an indication of which party's agenda has been hijacked by the big
money-men...
五月一日墨仔大罷工,原因是前一排 IFCO Systems 給聯邦部門大舉搜捕非法黑工,拉了千多個非法黑工,令到墨仔大怒,而根據CNN話,IFCO
Systems 一半以上都是用假的或偷回來的工咭,誰的工咭?你問到我。聯邦政府,IRS,社會安全局都沒有回應,因為如果咁做,又會引發另一種公眾恐慌:身份盜用。
如果你86年之後有搵過工,你一定要有工咭,車牌等,如果黑工沒有,就只有用盜用回來的ID咭了。
根據MSNBC的 Bob Sullivan 話社會安全局有420Billion,
四千二百億的稅金是由不知名的人交出,即是說,人名又錯,號碼又錯,地址又錯,甚至是老作的社會工咭是大有可能,盜用的又大有可能。
Illegal Aliens and American Medicine, by Madeleine
Pelner Cosman, Ph.D., Esq., The Journal of the
American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 10 Number
1 - Spring 2005