陽光最欣賞語錄:
You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the
wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for,
another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot
give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from
somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not
have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and
when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because
somebody else is going to get what they work for, that, my dear friend,
is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing
it.
向富人剝削自由不等於就是向窮人給予自由，當一個人無須努力而可以獲得，意味著另一個必須努力但是沒有收穫。一個政府，假如未預先向一群人剝奪，就沒可能向另一群人給予。一個國家，當一半的人認為自己不須要工作，因為有另一半人會照顧我們，而另一半人認為工作是無益的，因為做幾多都要分一半給別人，朋友，這個國家就完蛋了。把財產瓜分，跟本不能倍增財產。
Dr. Adrian Pierce Rogers (September 12, 1931 - November 15, 2005)
of Love Worth Finding Ministries, Pastor Emeritus of Bellevue Baptist
Church
第二最欣賞語錄：
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe
they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the
commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The
politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the
division of labor."當選民相信只要利用多票數，就可以享用別人努力的成果，這就是所謂民主政制破壞基本自由鐵一般的事實。佢地把十戒中戒條改寫，＂你不能盜搶！＂加多一句＂除非多數人投票贊成＂所謂民主，其實是一種搶掠政制，是道德的破壞，勞力財產的瓜分。
Gary North
"You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot
help small men by tearing down big men. You cannot strengthen the weak
by weakening the strong. You cannot lift the wage-earner by pulling down
the wage-payer. You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich. You
cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income. You cannot
further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot
establish security on borrowed money. You cannot build character and
courage by taking away men's initiative and independence. You cannot
help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for
themselves." – William Boetcker
There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party
platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.
There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who
owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861
There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party
platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent
on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.
There is no reference to "Jim Crow" as in "Jim Crow laws," nor
is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them.
These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by
Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC's missing years.
These laws segregated public schools, public transportation,
restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything
from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous
is that she sat in the "whites only" front section of a bus, the
"whites only" designation the direct result of Democrats.
There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan,
which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became
"a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party."
Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian
Allen Trelease's description of the Klan as the "terrorist arm of
the Democratic Party."
There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th,
14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned
slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred
Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court
justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former
slaves. The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.
There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the
Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress
over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat
before joining Lincoln's ticket in 1864. The law was designed to
provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign
contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
There is no reference to the Democrats' opposition to the Civil
Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and
signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited
racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
There is no reference to the Democrats' 1904 platform, which
devotes a section to "Sectional and Racial Agitation," claiming the
GOP's protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights
to blacks sought to "revive the dead and hateful race and sectional
animosities in any part of our common country," which in turn "means
confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now
happily healed."
There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20,
that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights
as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP
platforms of those years specifically address "Rights of the Negro"
(1908), oppose lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New
Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks "wards
of the state."
There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924,
known to history as the "Klanbake." The 103-ballot convention was
held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of
the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan
violence was defeated outright. To celebrate, the Klan staged a
rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly
across the Hudson from the site of the convention. Attended by
hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured
burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and
Catholics.
There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who
segregated the federal government, at the direction of President
Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There \is a
reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the
military after World War II.
There is reference to the fact that Democrats created
the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and
created Social Security with Wilson's New Freedom and FDR's New
Deal. There is no mention that these programs were created as the
result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of
blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local
officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen and
U.S. senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then
segregation between 1800 and 1965. Nor is there reference to the
deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of
life in return for election support for three post-Civil War
Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin
Roosevelt.
There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to
the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or
that 80% of the "nay" vote in the Senate came from Democrats.
Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition
included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West
Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore
Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore.
Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact
that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who
infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors,
was in fact--yes indeed--a member of both the Democratic National
Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.
窮，係一種精神病
而在辯論會中，Santorum 提到窮，三種方法可以防止，就係：
Stay in school.
Don’t get pregnant
When you get out of school get a job. Any job. And keep that
job until you can find one that pays more.
Our research shows that if you want to avoid poverty and join the
middle class in the United States, you need to complete high school (at
a minimum), work full time and marry before you have children. If you do
all three, your chances of being poor fall from 12 percent to 2 percent,
and your chances of joining the middle class or above rise from 56 to 74
percent. (We define middle class as having an income of at least $50,000
a year for a family of three.)
還有：
Higher marriage rates among the poor would benefit poor adults
themselves, their children, and the nation … According to the U.S.
Census Bureau, children living in single-parent families are about five
times as likely to live in poverty. There’s also a high probability
they’ll drop out of school, get arrested, be involved in teen pregnancy
themselves, have more mental health problems, and be less likely to be
employed or in school as young adults. Indeed, parents themselves are
physically and psychologically better off when married than single.
“We can’t wait for Congress to act, if Republicans choose path of
obstruction rather than cooperation then the President is not going to
sit here, this gridlock in Washington is not an excuse for inaction,
he’s going to take the actions that he can take using his executive
authority to help the cause here. They can be small, medium or large
actions.”
而奧巴馬演講名句，我身為總統，有責任唔使要國會都去做我要做嘅嘢！
Obama: "I Have An
Obligation As President To Do What I Can Without" Congress
擺到明係老強！而最老強行為，就係國會沒有休會的休會人事任命。
原來總統的任命，要靠國會拍板，國會唔通過，總統都唔可以亂咁人事任命。通常總統會在大時大節，國會休會，來個休會任命，國會一早知奧巴馬會咁做，於是唔休會，每三日叫班議員叫係咁意開會，即係
pro forma
session。條無法無天奧巴馬，竟然在國會開完會第二日（通常等十日八日才合規矩），立即任命，而且仲係之前國會認為有問題的人事任命。有違美國憲法！這就是來硬的！
“The President’s decision to circumvent the Senate and use a
recess appointment naming John Bolton as ambassador to the United
Nations is a mistake….For President Bush to use a recess appointment
for such a controversial nominee – not because there was a
compelling case that Mr. Bolton was the best person for the job, but
merely because the President had the power to do it –
subverts the confirmation process in ways that will further harm the
United States’ reputation in the eyes of the international
community. The American people deserve better.” (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, “President’s Recess Appointment Of John
Bolton Is A ‘Mistake,’”
Press Release, 08/01/05)
President Obama on Thursday will unveil a summer-jobs initiative that
the White House says is already on track to create 180,000 “work
opportunities” in the private sector in 2012.
That is the number of opportunities, which includes mentoring and unpaid
internships, that companies have told the administration they are
willing to create. Some 70,000 jobs are paid, the White House says.
Every day, the U.S. government takes in $6 billion and spends $10
billion. This means that every day the federal government spends
$4 billion more dollars than it has.
After The Civil Rights Act was passed Democrat President
Lyndon Johnson praised Republicans for their
overwhelming support.
The Republican
Party was formed by anti-slavery
activists to combat the pro-slavery Democrats
The Ku Klux Klan was formed by
radical Democrats who opposed equality for
blacks.
In 1935 Democrats defeated an
Anti-Lynching Bill supported and put forward by
Republicans.
The 1924 Democrat National Convention in New
York was host to one of the largest Klan gatherings
in American history. Dubbed the “Klanbake convention”,
a minority of delegates attempted to condemn the presence of the
Klan but was rebuked by the Klan supporting Democrat
Majority.
On April 20, 1871 the Republican Congress
enacted the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing
Democratic Party-Affiliated terrorist groups.
Ronald Reagan, a Republican,
made history on November 2, 1983 by signing into law
Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a National
Holiday. This is the first and only Federal
Holiday that recognizes a Black American.
看看這個標題，即是奧巴馬已經成功了。成功地把富人的財富大幅減少。但誤信奧巴馬的低能人，我問你一個問題，奧巴馬向通渠佬亞祖的回答如果成立的話，佢話
when we spread the wealth, it's good for
everybody，如果把財產分配，就人人都好，咁請問富人財產少了，你的 fair share
在那裏？吓！咁你多出嚟份錢喺邊呀？點呀？答唔答得出呀？低能仔，好信唔信，去信條反資本主義，反美國的極左派賤公！
Ever since, there has been a raging debate over the best way to
restore growth and prosperity;
balance and fairness.
Throughout the country, it has sparked protests and political movements
– from the Tea Party to
the people who have been
occupying the streets of New York and other cities.
Their (the Republicans) philosophy is simple: we are better off
when everyone is left to fend
for themselves and play by their own rules. Well, I’m here to
say they are wrong. I’m here to reaffirm my deep conviction that we are
greater together than we are on our own. I believe that this country
succeeds when everyone gets a
fair shot, when everyone does their fair share, and when everyone plays
by the same rules.
奧巴馬佢又專登歪曲保守派的理念，保守派理念係每個人要為自己行為負責，唔係話你理得我吖，我有我自己的法例。錯。你講乜嘢 play by their
own rules 呀？保守派係 play be the rule of law ！係守法！係法治，不過，奧巴馬唔喜歡法治，只喜歡人治，rule
of man ，所謂民主制咪就係人治囉！暴民制囉！之後講每個人都得到公平的一份，付出公平的一份，everyone gets a fair
shot, when everyone does their<原文如此,唔係我寫錯>fair share,
佢話咁先國家成功，佢又錯！呢個係共產主義，係社會社義。國家一定唔會成功。中國共產黨都行資本主義啦，低能兼白痴！
But Roosevelt also knew that the
free market has never been a
free license to take whatever you want from whoever you can. It
only works when there are rules of the road to ensure that competition
is fair, open, and honest.
蝦，到底係邊班人宣傳呢種想法，係take whatever you want from whoever you can 呢？
係啦，冇錯啦，就係佔領運動暴民啦，佢哋依家去佔領法拍屋，銀行盤，點解呀？因為佢地認為佢地有 free license to take
whatever they want form whoever they can !
而低能奧巴馬呢？哈哈，乜自由市場係可以攞咩？自由市場你唔可以攞！你只可以交易，政府就係可以攞，同槍杆子政權去搶去攞。Only
government has a free license to take whatever they want from whoever
they
can！低能奧巴馬的垃圾言論，乜九流全霉咁就叫做痛批呀？哈哈，笑卵死我呀，低能編輯全無分析能力，人云亦云。自由市場經濟論，根本冇錯。由幾時開始自由市場講到好似佔領運動暴民咁要拉要鎖呀？
It’s not a view that says we should punish profit or success or pretend
that government knows how to fix all society’s problems. It’s a view that says
in America, we are greater together – when everyone engages in fair play,
everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share.
三個公平！fair play, fair shot, fair share！自由市場根本就係 fair
play公平的競爭遊戲，但係結果係唔會人人得到公平的收成。有人勤力，有人懶，有人做多有人做少。所以得到不公平的收穫就係最公平的成果。只有共產主義，社會主義，平均分配，才不公平。其實你講咁多做乜啫？你回答通渠佬亞祖時已經一句講晒：when
we spread the wealth, it's good for everybody. 撘真Ｄ味道，聽落都恐怖。
So what does that mean for restoring middle-class security in today’s
economy? It starts by making sure that everyone in America gets a fair shot at
success.
And so we’ve also paid for these investments by asking everyone to do
their fair share. If we had unlimited resources, no one would ever have to pay
any taxes and we’d never have to cut any spending. But we don’t have unlimited
resources. And so we have to set priorities. If we want a strong middle class,
then our tax code must reflect our
values. We have to make choices
This is the height of unfairness. It is wrong that in the United States
of America, a teacher or a nurse or a construction worker who earns $50,000
should pay a higher tax rate than somebody pulling in $50 million. It is wrong
for Warren Buffett’s secretary to pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffett.
Newt Gingrich says the
“core argument” conservatives have with President Barack Obama is that
he is “legitimately and authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical.” Gingrich
said Obama “believes in a world in which the classic America has
disappeared. He believes in a world in which the United Nations is more
important than the United States Congress. He believes in a world of
International Law rather than the United States Constitution.”
Warning: Graphic Language – Watch the video
below:
Later in the video, he then goes on to say “No more talking. They’ve got
guns, we’ve got bottles. They’ve got bricks, we’ve got rocks…in a few
days you’re going to see what a Molotov cocktail can do to Macy’s.”
Roughly 80 percent of millionaires in America are the first
generation of their family to be rich. They didn’t inherit their
wealth; they earned it. 有八成人係家族中第一代發達，白手興家。
According to a recent survey of the top 1 percent of American
earners, slightly less than 14 percent were involved in banking or
finance.１％有錢人中，只有少過一成四人做金融。
Roughly a third of millionaires were entrepreneurs or managers
of nonfinancial businesses. 三分一係企業家，或非金融業經理。
Nearly 16 percent of millionaires were doctors or other medical
professionals.一成六人係醫生，醫療專科。
Lawyers made up slightly more than 8 percent of millionaires,
and engineers, scientists and computer professionals another 6.6
percent.８％係狀師，６。６％係工程師，科學家，電腦專業。
Sports and entertainment figures composed almost 2 percent of
millionaires.運動員，明星佔２％
NYU sociologist Dalton Conley says that “higher-income folks
work more hours than lower-wage earners do.”有錢人做工時間長過低收入人。
Overall, the rich pay an effective tax rate (after all
deductions and exemptions) of roughly 24 percent. For all taxpayers
as a group, the average effective tax rate is about 11
percent.有錢人扣稅後稅率平均２４％，全國平均扣稅後稅率係１１％
Households with more than $1 million in income donated more than
$150 billion to charity last year, roughly half of all US charitable
donations. 搵一百萬以上人去年損錢多過１５００億，佔全國損錢總數一半。
你地班低能左傾白痴仔醒吓未呀？
今時今日仲死話救市案成功，有益。好心啦，奧巴馬在０９年演講中話：“All in all, many middle-class families will see their incomes
go up by about $3,000 because of the Recovery Act, helping them get back
much of what they've lost due to this recession.”
Bill Clinton: “I do believe that those of us in that income group should
be prepared to pay more as part of a long term settlement of that issue,” adding
that he thinks so “not because we should be punished for being successful but
because we’re in the best position to pay.”
佔領華爾街清場
